6. HOPE LIES IN THE STRUGGLE AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Toward Healthy Communities
"At their best, healthy communities practice the right
use of powers of life and lead people to experience wholeness,
right relationship, and beauty. When this happens, such communities
teach us to know ourselves and the world as sacred and sustain
an ethic of appreciative care for life." (Brock and Parker
2001, 9)
If "human experience is both the starting point and the ending
point of the circle of interpretation," then the experiences
of all not just half of God's creation must be given
weight and voice. (Ruether 1985, 111) Without women there would
be no men. Within community, the church and its various traditions
must commit itself to the full participation of all of its members,
including women. "The intent of liberating ethics is to transform
the tradition itself into an inclusive, hospitable tradition sufficiently
enlarged to welcome those it previously disempowered. The more
inclusive any community is of persons, perspectives, and life
experiences, the better chance it has of rendering a truthful
account of our common humanity." (Ellison 1996, 66)
Communities and their residents share collective trauma. For instance,
several Maine locales have been hit recently by mass unemployment
after the Great Northern Paper Mill in Millinocket, the Eastern
Fine Paper Mill in Brewer, and Lincoln Pulp and Paper shut down.
Even those residents who did not work at the mills cannot escape
the pain their neighbors endure as they attempt to rebuild lives,
many of which have been spent working at the mills. Some millworkers
were nearing retirement age when they were laid off, with few
prospects for successful job retraining. While municipalities
and labor unions have been holding spaghetti supper fund-raisers
for the displaced workers' families, and while calls for food
to pack pantries, fuel oil donations, and other supplies have
been generously answered, the extent of the trauma experienced
by individuals depends largely upon that person's family environment.
Trauma response is greatest for those families and individuals
whose relationships are broken.
Stress may lead to family violence, and already established domestic
abuse may be exacerbated. Experiencing this extreme level of stress,
however, should not be accepted as an excuse for battering an
intimate partner or children. We are better served by attempting
to understand where the messages that affect batterers' thinking
come from since many instances of family violence have no particular
connection with such extreme community trauma as mass layoffs.
Solutions may arise when communities open their hearts and minds
to think of how domestic violence affects the entire population,
not just couples in distress.
Though much good work has been done to frame domestic abuse
as nothing less than a public health and safety crisis, more work
is needed to change the culture that germinates seeds of abuse,
that empowers men to dominate women.
Collective change in how we think about domestic violence is called for. We must change the culture together. To begin, practicing good sexual ethics may be in order. Marie Fortune's book Love Does No Harm: Sexual Ethics for the Rest of Us, offers a guide to forming healthful relationships between equal partners.
How does this wisdom get communicated widely enough for all to
hear? Who will be the messenger? How do we train our ears to hear?
Pastors with churches and rabbis with synagogues certainly have
before them a captive audience, at least on Sundays and Saturdays.
One Bangor pastor speaks out about the importance of church
in everyone's life, whether that church takes the form of a "synagogue,
a cathedral, an ocean, a mountain, a goddess or bank, everyone
worships something somewhere."(BDN, March 2004.) The Rev.
Elaine Peresluha said she does not believe in the separation of
church and state. '"Church" and state are inexorably
linked in our country. As they should be."
While it is true that many of this nation's early immigrants
arrived to escape religious persecution, in search of freedom
to worship as they pleased, when it came time to craft nation
forming documents, the men in charge aimed to avoid creating a
theocracy and endorsing a state religion, not to ban religious
diversity. In fact, many of those men professed to be very religious.
To this day, the United States Congress opens its sessions with
prayer.
"Rather than protecting an illusion of separation, we need
to be honest about our connections between church and state. Why
don't we have it all out on the table to incorporate in our democratic
process rather than pretending it is not there? Our places of
worship are the dominant environments for value formation and
clarification." (Ibid.)
On Tuesday, March 16, 2004, one such place of worship became
an environment for value clarification and confirmation. Grace
United Methodist Church in Bangor joined the First Congregational
Church, UCC, in Brewer, Spruce Run and the Penobscot County Domestic
Abuse Task Force to sponsor a community candlelight vigil to remember
victims of domestic abuse and affirm the goal of peace in all
homes. This vision, though it is wrapped in hope, recognizes the
terrible odds that militate against a solution to injustice and
against healthful relationships.
Women and men must muster their best selves and join in the battle
to seek true equality for themselves and their heirs. They must
push for criminal justice system and social reforms and lobby
for legislative changes that ensure safety for women and men in
non-violent relationships.
This vision charges policy makers to activate empathy, to show
mercy and to seek justice.
The story of Hester Prynne and the scarlet letter may also offer
a new vision of women's own power to effect change and resist
oppression in their lives. Rather than cower behind a tiny scarlet
letter, Hester instead wore a large, embellished badge. As she
testified when the commonwealth threatened to take her child,
"This badge hath taught me it daily teaches me
and is teaching me at this moment lessons whereof my child
may be the wiser and better."
But while Prynne, in true Puritan form, dismissed any profit
that she herself could gain from what she had learned, women today
must use the lessons society forces upon them and turn them upside
down to their own benefit. "We can resist and redress violence
by acting for justice and by being present to one another, present
to beauty, present to the fire at the heart of things, the spirit
that gives breath to life." (Brock and Parker 2001, 10)
Legal Shifts: Does Mandatory Arrest Add Insult to Injury?
According to Linda Mills, her book Insult to Injury is "an
attempt to become conscious of the pervasiveness of violence,
its role in our intimate lives, and the judgments we make about
it." (2003, 2) To clarify Mills' thesis, she is actually
attempting to become conscious of the pervasiveness of violence,
its role in her intimate life, and the judgments she makes about
it. Mills uses her book to exorcise her own violent demons that
readers may only suspect until the last chapter.
The book begins with Mills recalling a scene she and a friend
witnessed between a mother and her five-year-old son. The boy
was demanding his mother's attention and trying her patience,
so she slapped his face. Mills recalls feeling "sad for the
child and angry with his mother." Then the boy punched his
mother. "In that split second, we had witnessed the genesis
of intimate abuse," she writes. "The little boy would
grow up to become a man, and he was already being taught to respond
to women with violence." (Ibid., 1)
As the mother of two adult children, I bristled against Mills'
judgment on this incident. Not being a mother herself, Mills is
not in a position to properly assess the situation she stumbled
upon on a London sidewalk. In my view, Mills unfairly and unreasonably
places blame for the situation squarely on the mother. Ignoring
her own admonition, she judged the situation before attempting
to understand it. I do not condone violence in any manner, but
I know I join legions of other frustrated, exhausted parents when
I admit to times when the temptation to warm my young children's
behinds was nearly overwhelming.
Mills writes, "It was only when I started to write this
book that I realized that I, too, was engaged in a dynamic of
abuse." (145) This study, though, is about women victims
of violence, not about Linda Mills' recovery and discovery.
On to the topic at hand, every state, except Arkansas and Washington,
D.C., has mandatory arrest policies in cases of domestic violence.
According to Mills, "strong evidence suggests that mandatory
arrest may actually increase the incidence of violence in some
women's lives." (2003, 37.)
A self-described feminist and veteran activist, Mills uses
her book to reflect "on where some feminists went wrong"
in relation to domestic violence and to promote the need for other
feminists to pursue a different agenda. She comes out swinging,
however, and attacks those whom she calls "mainstream feminists"
for failing to understand intimate abuse and the choices women
make when they are involved in abusive relationships. (Ibid.,
5)
Among other issues, Mills argues that "continued advocacy
for an almost exclusive focus on punishment in response to domestic
violence represents [feminists'] fear that if they capitulate
in any way, or recognize any limitations to their approach, they
will lose the benefits they have gained." (Ibid., 4) Central
to her criticism is that though some life-threatening cases of
domestic abuse might call for arrest, prosecution and imprisonment,
"in most cases a woman should be free to choose her own destin[y],
with or without criminal sanctions, and after the state has provided
options that respect her specific needs while also offering her
methods that would help her be safe."
While Mills should be commended for her serious consideration of how we think about and respond to domestic abuse, unless and until society can rethink its norms, beliefs and sexist attitudes that sanction men's power over women, her suggestions about the "right" way to handle incidents of violence in the home are at least premature and at most dangerous to women.
Money Matters: Domestic Violence Costs Employers
In this state and nation, where capitalism may be likened to
religion, we should not be surprised that money is behind one
of the latest means suggested in the struggle against domestic
violence. If this new idea continues to work as well as it has
recently, businesses may be able to contribute more than a few
bucks a year to the cause. Their efforts will help eradicate domestic
abuse, one employee at a time, when it affects their bottom line.
Maine officials including Governor John Baldacci, Labor Commissioner
Laura Fortman, and Attorney General Steven Rowe are guiding the
state in that direction. Rowe's ingenious initiative frames domestic
violence not as private pain, but as a work hazard. Rowe paid
close attention to a February 2004 report by the Maine Department
of Labor showing that domestic abusers cost employers money through
lost work time and on-the-job accidents.
Fortman, the former director of the Maine Women's Lobby, said
the study is the first of its kind in the nation to correctly
reframe the story and force batterers' accountability. "There
have been studies regarding the impact that domestic violence
has on victims' work performance, but this is the first to study
the implications to businesses because of the offenders' actions,"
she said. At a press conference heralding release of this groundbreaking
study, Governor Baldacci pledged that his administration was tackling
the issue in a comprehensive way, involving several state departments.
Maine cannot afford the costs incurred as a result of domestic
violence. Attorney General Rowe knows only too well that more
than half of all homicides committed in Maine are related to domestic
violence. According to the Kennebec Journal, Rowe's office itself
adopted a policy in which the workplace assumes some responsibility
for addressing domestic abuse in employees' lives. With the help
of the state's ten Family Violence Projects, Rowe's office provides
three hours of training for all his staff on the issue.
After the report's release, Rowe said in his speech to a Rotary
Club meeting in Waterville covered by the Kennebec Journal, "Over
half of homicides in the state are related to domestic violence.
It's in our communities." Rowe himself has undergone eighteen
hours of training to become a responder, charged with providing
support and information to victims.
However, the message the Rotary members heard went beyond the
damage that battered women endure to spell out the economic damage
wrought by domestic violence. He exhorted employers to meet the
issue head-on. "If you don't have one already, I'm going
to challenge you to implement a domestic violence workplace policy.
Domestic abuse is not throwing tantrums or workplace stress, but
a pattern of coercive behavior that seeks power or control through
violent threats or actions."
He referred to a recent federal study that showed that domestic
violence costs the nation $133 billion a year. In Maine, Rowe
said, this translates to $1,000 per person. Alongside substance
abuse, Rowe said, domestic violence is one of "the two big
evils of the state."
Domestic violence and abuse haunt the victim at the workplace, Rowe said. Invoking memories of Leslie Ann Bullock, the Fairfield mother of three killed by an abusive ex-husband in May 2003, Rowe sent a sobering reminder that women - the victims in 95 percent of domestic violence cases are most often killed when they try to leave the abusive relationship. "Survivors are heroes," he said. "It's not easy. What you can do is try to be supportive, and make sure they understand they have choices."(Ibid.)
A good ethic envisions healthy communities where abuse victims
have choices about their lives.